Keeping Clients and Customers: Why not compete on “Ease-of-Use”?

If the following seems like a previous post, you are right. We’ll keep publishing a version of it until “Ease-of-Use” as a term of art/catch phrase replaces “Customer Service”. WAC? is convinced that “Customer Service” throws people, bores people or renders them straight-up Numb…

What if the Services Sector, now King, competed for clients and customers on the basis of “Ease-of-Use”?

Develop and apply ease-of-use concepts for products and goods to pure services? Our clients’ services? Our services? Law. Accounting. Consulting. Advertising. Newer and non-traditional services, too. Anything where a service (something valuable but “invisible”) or product-service mix is part of what you pay for. In other words, pretty much Everything these days–and the direction global markets now march, in good and bad times.
80273b.jpg
Consider for a moment just products. In 2006, The Folgers Coffee Company was awarded an Ease-of-Use Commendation by the Arthritis Foundation for its AromaSealâ„¢ Canister. If you’re a Folgers® drinker, you notice that Folgers® added an easy-to-peel tin freshness seal (no need for a can-opener), a new “snap-tight” lid and even a grip on its plastic red can.

Folgers® did it for coffee cans. IBM and CISCO have ease-of-use programs for the products they sell.